[TI-H] Re: PICs in general

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [TI-H] Re: PICs in general
From: Krevinek <krevinek@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:28:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <004201c1f133$45f82140$080a0a0a@ronald>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 10:06 AM, Ronald Teune wrote:

> Home-made programmers for specific PICs are much cheaper :)
> BTW, what's the difference between PIC16C84 and PIC16F84? Everything 
> I've
> seen supports both of them.

Nothing much from the end-user POV as far as I can tell, less RAM in the 
C84 if I recall correctly. Although the x84 chips are rather tight with 
code space, so more complex interfaces like filesystems are tough on em.

References:

[TI-H] Re: PICs in general

From: "Ronald Teune" <rtwolf@gmx.net>

Prev: [TI-H] Re: TiDrive (Was PIXpander & Stuff)
Next: [TI-H] Re: PICs in general
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread