Re: TI-H: Dead?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Dead?




it was right when i got it

At 07:01 PM 1/26/00 -0600, you wrote:

>Yeah, I saw that.  But outlook express said the date received was 12/31/69...
>
>Bryan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Noah R Deneau" <noahd@juno.com>
>To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 5:24 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: Dead?
>
>
> >
> > Look a couple lines down, it says Wednesday, January 26, 2000 5:00 PM.
> >
> > -Noah
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:06:39 -0600 "Bryan Rabeler"
> > <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu> writes:
> > >
> > > Is it just me, or was the date on this e-mail 12/31/69 at 6:11 PM?
> > >
> > > Bryan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Larry79054@aol.com>
> > > To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 5:00 PM
> > > Subject: Re: TI-H: Dead?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > TWIMC,
> > > >      I prefer the taste/feel of Coke.  But, here in Merced, CA, to
> > > where I've
> > > > retired, it's damned near impossible to find a business that
> > > serves Coke as
> > > > its soft drink---just Pepsi and its products (a very few do, and
> > > it is still
> > > > possible to buy it in bottles and cans at retailers).  I'm told
> > > that Pepsi
> > > > made a BIG effort awhile back to undercut the price of Coke and
> > > has
> > > > essentially taken over, as a result.  So, as far as Merced is
> > > concerned, it's
> > > > Coke's own fault, as they refuse to budge on their pricing policy.
> > >  They just
> > > > might, eventually, not be available here at all, if they keep that
> > > up.
> > > > Larry Teebken (larry79054@aol.com)
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 1/26/00 11:39:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> > > BFHSNO@aol.com
> > > > writes:
> > > >
> > > > << I agree, I think the reason they were worried about Microsoft
> > > is that
> > > >  everyone was dependant on it, and they did things to keep
> > > themsleves on top,
> > > >  and others down. I don't think that America's general preference
> > > for Coke
> > > >  constitutes a forced monopoly on Coke's part. I won't argue with
> > > the expense
> > > >  though. :)
> > > >   >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> > Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
> > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
> >
> >
>


__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html


References: