Re: TI-H: TI Modem
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: TI Modem
>Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>> >Let's stop here and start over. Even through much miscommunication, I
>> >think it is
>> >clear that 1.7MB per second or 7.5MB per second whichever it may be is
>> >considerably
>> >faster than 5KB per second, would you not agree?
>>
>> Sure its faster. Infact, many cisco routers used the 68000 in their
>>designs.
>>
>> I've got a TCP/IP stack written completely for the 68000 with a 3-Com
>> ethernet hacked to it. Anyone interested in getting the file?
>>
>
>YES. Very interested.
>
>>
>> >Um.. A 68000 uses 4 clock cycles per bus cycle. Another embedded thing?
>>
>> Must be a combo of old and new stuff. I have a mid 1995 databook. Maybe I
>> read the thing wrong.
>
>I just took a class on the 68000 and we actually used the TI92 in the class
>because the school's stuff was not working. (check my web site, URL
>below. It's
>pretty funny.) Anyway, we used a 1996 book. It does into detail on the bus
>cycle, its pretty clear that it is 4 clock cycles. Same as the PIC I believe,
>but with the PIC all commands are RISC. PICs rule. Right under the 68000
>series. x86 can burn in the theological place of eternal punishment as
>far as I
>am concerned. :)
The AVRs are cooler. 1 bus cycle, 1 clock cycle. The processor fetches
the instruction, runs it, and everything in one clock cycle. its RISCier
than the PIC. :)
References: