RE: TI-H: Radio switch
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: TI-H: Radio switch
whatever... I never go there... sorry for being ignorant of knowing how
download.com works... I just guessed...
At 09:58 PM 1/9/99 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Dan:
>If you notice at download.com, they never have the files at there site.
>They always have them mirrored out to several different sites, completely
>unrealted to them.
>True, im sure there html server has lots of requests, but i think a t3
>couldadequately handle that load.
>
>kaus
>
>At 10:53 PM 1/9/99 +0000, you wrote:
>>
>>Yea, that is what I was thinking - I didn't actually think you meant a full
>>blown T3... I don't think download.com has a T3, they might, but with the
>>number of people downloading files (and multiple files), I'll bet they have
>>a direct connection backbone... but whatever... 10Mbit is good... JUST as
>>long as it isn't @Home. Everyone knows they blow arse...
>>
>>At 06:54 PM 1/9/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>>No, not really.. I noticed that even at our company network (not many
>>>people, about 50 or so, not all using internet at same time), but that
>>>between 2 points (not using the same intranet that we're on) but using a
>>>site like download.com or a place like that, I only get a peak download of
>>>one file at a time of about 150K/sec. Of course, when I go and get 6 or
7,
>>>it still stays up around 150, might drop a bit, but it never seems to go
>>>higher than that... maybe it's just he provider that our company's with...
>>>It might just be a limitation of our network, and I'm not saying that ADSL
>>>gets 150k off a T3... I guarantee that it will be faster! :)
>>
>>-Dan
>>
>>
>
>
-Dan
References: