RE: TI-H: PIC's
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: TI-H: PIC's
Sounds interesting.
Can you point me to the datasheet page ??
Haven´t you find the expander E(g) source ?? CAn anybody on the list tell me
where to find it .
Grant did you send the source to the list?? Maybe its in the TIcalc archive
Thanks
Javier
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
Para: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Fecha: Miércoles 4 de Agosto de 1999 01:31 a.m.
Asunto: Re: TI-H: PIC's
>
>No, its the Intel186 (all one word). Its a microcontroller thats
>compatible with the 88 and 86 software. Some of them can only access
>64kbyte or 64MByte.
>
>They're all different. The cool thing is that they have internal flash,
>internal ram, and can run dos. $5 for that! :)
>
>Grant
>
>>186? As in 80186? I heard of that chip referred to in computer magazines
a
>>few years ago but I had thought it was just some idiot writing the ad who
>>didn't really know what he was talking about.
>>
>>----Original Message Follows----
>> >Grant, I usually appreciate your comments in this list, but I suppose I
>>don't
>> >understand your point of reference. Yes, some PICs are expensive
compared
>>to
>> >other processors. But for some products and users, they work much
better
>>than
>> >other processors.
>> >
>> >When you say general comments such as, "The newer ones cost way too
much."
>>It
>> >would be more helpful if you would qualify that by stating what they
cost
>>too
>> >much for. Hobbyist use? Maybe. Pace Makers? Dunno. Large
>> >manufacturers who
>> >can order them in 1M quantities? Probably not.
>>
>>For a bunch of things. Since the 186 has come out it has filled large
>>embedded apps, and the AVR and COP the rest.
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________
>>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>
>
Follow-Ups: