Re: TI-H: linux...

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: linux...
From: "Gabe" <gabeman@earthling.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1998 17:41:59 -0400
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


----Original Message-----
From: Firepower5@aol.com <Firepower5@aol.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, September 12, 1998 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: linux...


>
>In a message dated 9/12/98 3:53:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
gussie@alaska.net
>writes:


>>I'd much rather use bash.
>
>And how many people use bash???


Not to support/bash Grant or anything, but I tend to prefer bash or tcsh.

>
>>>Show the world you prefer games to speed (Win95 vs Mac)
>
>>Just got done playing quake 1.0 on VPC 2.0.  In fact, it was an online
>>game.  jared has a quake server at quake.greatland.net
>
>Now go buy Unreal or Forsaken and try getting anything over 15 FPS on your
>Mac.
>(They practically NEED a 3dFX card, which, by the way has 10x better 3D
than
>any Mac in existance.  And unsuprisingly it works only with IBM
architectures,
>what a cawinkydink.)


How about Quake 2? I can get about 20fps at 640x480 on my pII with a Stealth
64. I'd like to see a Mac running Quake 2 using vpc.

>
>Rob Hornick
>Show the world you don't care what Grant thinks
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: linux...

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>