Re: TI-H: I'm baaaaaacccccckkkk!!!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: I'm baaaaaacccccckkkk!!!
I've never heard of a bus ring ever used in a non-research environment.
Even the one GM (?) conjured up was never really used. But, that's not to
say it's not a good idea. And it would probably be a very good thing to
think about when doing calculator networks (oops, hope I didn't infringe
on Grant's or someone else's copyright by saying that phrase!)...
And there's definitly never been an industry standard bus ring.
af
On Fri, 4 Sep 1998, David Knaack wrote:
>
> >From: Christopher Kalos <raptorone@geocities.com>
> >And Grant, Token Ring never needed a RING. it acts as if it works in a
> >ring, you can connect them similarly to ethernet connections in terms
> of
> >the physical hookup.
>
> Typicaly IBM token ring is a physical star, logical ring.
> I just depends on if you are talking physical or logical
> configuration. Some systems use a token ring (ie logical ring)
> on thinnet.
>
> DK
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Fritzler |
afritz@delphid.ml.org | Animals who are not penguins can
afritz@iname.com | can only wish they were.
http://delphid.ml.org/~afritz/ | -- Chicago Reader
http://www.pst.com/ | 15 Oct 1982
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References: