Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...




:)  No.  You use excite www mail...  I wouldn't buy any cable modem service
that didn't give me atleast a dyn ip.  Your CM service is just like AOL in
that respect.  :\

Your mail footer:
--->_______________________________________________________
--->Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/

You don't need a deticated connection to share a POP account...

>First of all, my invisible cable modem is sending invisible emails, so they
>are transparent and come up as "excite" for some unknown reason.  No, really
>my dumb ass cable company backed the cable 6 months and growing, even tho
>there are phiber lines installed.  I'm not planning on setting up mailboxes
>until I get that connection.  I've only used Slakware and RedHat... as soon
>as cable becomes accessable to me, then I will inform you of my system info,
>since I'm going to set up a LAN with routers for a WAN with some other guys,
>breaking FCC reg. of course, but who will find out? The OC will be buried
>sooo deep... mmm.
>
>
>On Fri, 27 Nov 1998 19:49:11 -0900, Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>>
>> I run the developer network version 3.51 for one snmp tool only.
>>
>> >Well I hope all of you are using pirated versions of NT... the last thing
>I
>> >want to hear is "Grant and Jon -- dedicated NT users that paid for
>it"...
>> >I'm sorry that Linux couldn't fit your needs... maybe someday you'll be
>> >dedicated Linux users.
>>
>> Which version of linux do you use?  If you were a deticated linux user
>> you'd know how to config a POP box as a multi account acount with a
>> different name for each user.  Then maybe you wouldn't have to use
>'Excite'.
>>
>> You can't ping my linux box since I've set it not to reply to pings.
>> WinNuke or anyother sorry excuse for a wannabe hacer doesn't do anything
>to
>> my unpatched computers either.  For fun, I just tried it.  Did nothing.
>> This is what makes someone mad:
>>
>> 130.13.16.129.in-addr.arpa  PTR   86283   darkwing.ced.chalmers.se
>> 11/24/98 19:35:50  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:37:01  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:37:37  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:37:55  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:38:12  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:38:30  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:38:48  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:39:23  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:39:41  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:39:59  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:40:16  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:40:35  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:40:52  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:41:10  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:41:28  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/24/98 19:41:45  ICMP from: 129.16.13.130  size: 1428  type: Echo
>Request
>> (ping)
>>
>> He did that for 3 hours.  I let him have his fun.  He thought he could
>get
>> me off the net.  I e-mailed to his sysadmin and havn't heard from him
>> since.  :)
>>
>> Oh yeah, these don't harm me either...
>>
>> 11/27/98 16:08:49  ICMP from: 192.168.50.50  size: 52  type: Echo Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/27/98 16:09:16  ICMP from: 192.168.50.50  size: 28
>> 11/27/98 16:16:48  ICMP from: 192.168.50.50  size: 52  type: Echo Request
>> (ping)
>> 11/27/98 16:16:48  ICMP from: 192.168.50.50  size: 32
>> 11/27/98 16:16:48  CMonitorTask flush
>>
>> He wastes his time all day too trying to get me off.  He is doing a
>pattern
>> that usually crash a tcp stack.  But not here...  My computer just
>flushes
>> the data.
>>
>> Grant
>>
>>
>> >> actually, i'm in vindows NT vor the moment because UnReal and HalfLife
>> >are
>> >> not, and will no be available for Linux. Rather unfortunate i think...
>> >>
>> >> -- Jon
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Dan <danb@excite.com>
>> >> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>> >> Date: Friday, November 27, 1998 10:30 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: TI-H: Re: Speedy Calc...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Yea right... "software 3D" is pretty much equal to "RAM doubler"...
>> >hehe...
>> >> >and I don't think they have half as many good games for linux or any
>PPC
>> >> for
>> >> >that matter as a normal Intel comp.  Then again, I'm not a game
>expert,
>> >so
>> >> I
>> >> >wouldn't know much... but I do know that a serious gamer wouldn't be
>> >> >satisified with linux games.  Although Quake for linux is good enough
>> >for
>> >> >me... no 3D Accel. Card necessary.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Or you could just get a PPC workstation, linux, and used software
>3D
>> >with
>> >> >> the same performance and quality.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Grant
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Well you could have sold it and bought a nice new Palm Pilot III
>and
>> >> >still
>> >> >> >had money left over to buy a new 3D card for your gaming
>pleasures.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> my dad got it as a gift from the company he works for...
>> >> >> >> he doesn't use it.. so why shouldn't I?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> stop jumping to conclusions fer cryin out loud
>> >> >> >> -dave
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> <<
>> >> >> >>  What you don't have one? Oh ok... so you make programs and you
>> >can't
>> >> >> >even
>> >> >> >>  test them because you don't have one... Now if you did have
>one,
>> >then
>> >> >> >I'd
>> >> >> >>  consider you "rich" for wasting the money on it.  If you like
>> >> >clicking
>> >> >> >on
>> >> >> >>  tiny start menu's, then I guess thats OK too.
>> >> >> >>   >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >-dan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >You standing in line?
>> >> >> >You believing the lies?
>> >> >> >You bowing down to this flag?
>> >> >> >You've Got a Bullet in Your Head.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >_______________________________________________________
>> >> >> >Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >-dan
>> >> >
>> >> >You standing in line?
>> >> >You believing the lies?
>> >> >You bowing down to this flag?
>> >> >You've Got a Bullet in Your Head.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >_______________________________________________________
>> >> >Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >-dan
>> >
>> >You standing in line?
>> >You believing the lies?
>> >You bowing down to this flag?
>> >You've Got a Bullet in Your Head.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________________
>> >Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/
>>
>
>-dan
>
>You standing in line?
>You believing the lies?
>You bowing down to this flag?
>You've Got a Bullet in Your Head.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________
>Get your free, private e-mail at http://mail.excite.com/


References: