Re: TI-H: why

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: why
From: Scott Pierce <spierce@geocities.com>
Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 17:41:35 -0700
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <8164fabe.354bb927@aol.com>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

One reason might be that the 82, 85, and 92 don't support asm...and the
drivers for the expanders would most likely have to be in asm....or at
least an addition to their ROM.

Scott Pierce

At 08:24 PM 5/2/98 EDT, you wrote:
>
>ok, i have heard alot of talk about memory expanders and many other things
>that sound great... i guess i am just wondering why  texas instruments does
>not take these projects and create them themselves... i'm sure they would
make
>a hell of alot of money from creating there own expander because of the big
>demand for it.
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: TI-H: why

From: Richard Piotter <richfile@prairie.lakes.com>

References:

TI-H: why

From: S43R80 <S43R80@aol.com>

Prev: Re: TI-H: Re: these are surely things to ponder about :-Þ
Next: Re: TI-H: why
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread