Re: TI-H: random email


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: random email




On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Grant Stockly wrote:

> 
> Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...
> 
> If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
> Inc. processors.

if it were truly superior, it would run on anything


> 
> >That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
> >To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
> >Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
> >
> >
> >
> >Please, take it to e-mail;  the last thing this list needs is another PC/MAC
> >flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
> >To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
> >Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
> >
> >
> >>
> >>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
> >>
> >><<
> >> Itīs the reason you arenīt lumbered with stone-age command-line interfaces
> >> as your only OS option, buddy.
> >>
> >> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II chip, and
> >> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
> >>
> >>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows will run
> >>better on that machine, then on a PC.
> >>
> >>Just my .02
> >>Dave
> >>
> 
> 

 _        _  __     __             _ _                                  _
|        / |/ /_ __/ /_____         |       Nuke Skyjumper               |
|       /    / // /  '_/ -_)        |         "Master of the Farce"      |
|_     /_/|_/\_,_/_/\_\\__/        _|_           nuke@bayside.net       _|


References: