Re: TI-H: random email

To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
From: "Jon Olson" <morph@jmss.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 22:55:31 -0500
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


DEC already did it - new Alpha

-- Jon Olson

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Brack <reb@netride.com>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: random email



Yeah, did you hear they are coming out with a 1-teraflop (1000mhz) chip in a
few years?


-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: random email



Actually there is no superior OS, and Macs and IBMs are both PCs...

If there was a superior OS it wouldn't run on Intel, it would run on IBM
Inc. processors.

>That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>
>Please, take it to e-mail;  the last thing this list needs is another
PC/MAC
>flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>>
>>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
>>
>><<
>> It4s the reason you aren4t lumbered with stone-age command-line
interfaces
>> as your only OS option, buddy.
>>
>> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II chip, and
>> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
>>
>>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows will
run
>>better on that machine, then on a PC.
>>
>>Just my .02
>>Dave
>>