Re: TI-H: special component
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: special component
You could just write junky code and use a new generation RISC processor...
:) Consider all options... :)
I'd like to see 10B-t do over 300k per sec... :)
>I don't know. If it were using 3 MIPS to transfer data (max.. networks
>aren't usually running at full speed because you'd get a lot of
>collisions) then there would be 2 MIPS left over. That's 40% of the
>processor time, so if you could write some real slick code that
>efficiently used every slice of processor time, then you might be able to
>pull it off. I don't think I could do it, though. I'd probably have to go
>for a higher-powered Motorola 68HC series or something. I would guess
>that's what is used in those little pocket-print-server things. Then
>again, they do very little other than scan the incoming stuff and whenever
>something arrives with the correct IP address they pass it through a
>buffer to the parallel port.
>
>
>On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Jon Olson wrote:
>
>> Don't you think that the chip would however, get backlogged with data after
>> a while? i mean...it could in theory bring in the data and send it back out
>> that quickly, however if it's planning on doing anything real with the
>> data, i don't think that this will work at all well. however, if you can
>> find a way to make it work on a 10 Mhz network. Please tell me. I've been
>> considdering building a little device that connects to a modem and to my
>> dad's office network and allows me to dial in and execute various tasks
>> (i.e. reboot my servers there, connect via telnet to some of the firewalled
>> workstations, that kind of thing).
>
>--
>Greg Hill
>greg-hill@bigfoot.com
>www.comports.com/link
Follow-Ups:
References: