Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
Well, it really depends on font size. On my screen (17", 1024x768) on my
font (dammned if I remember that) that is about 2" to me.
On a completely unrelated, yet on topic note, i still haven't got any
replies (besides the one) about my link cable.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph M. Geiss <joseph@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, June 21, 1998 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
>
>try using something else then * or | to represent width, on my
>screen(1600x1200) your 2" is about 1/2"-1"
>
>joe
>
>webrunner wrote:
>
>> Which is persisely why one shouldn't do it.
>> on my screen two inches is around
>> ************
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: matt johson <matt.johnson@wmich.edu>
>> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Date: Saturday, June 20, 1998 10:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: TI-H: robotics (was TI-H: RE: cool)
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >How in world do you tie your shoe our any thing for that matter with 2"
>> >thick cable? keep in mind that a two inch thick cable is about this
thick;
>> >
>> > | |
>> > | |
>> >
>> >just curious,
>> >
>> >-matt <matt.johnson@wmich.edu>
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> << Remember, don't tie your shoes with 2" thick steel airplane control
>> >> surface
>> >> cable. :)
>> >>
>> >> Bryan >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Why Not? I thought it was pretty cool.......
>> >
>
>
>
>