Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited
From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 14:44:14 -0400
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <l0313030bb1d3fa9ef164@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130304b1d3f45f7999@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130304b1d3f45f7999@[192.168.1.66]> <l0313030bb1d3fa9ef164@[192.168.1.66]> <l03130302b1d4c845b66d@[192.168.1.66]>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Grant Stockly wrote:
> 
> >>>You only need 2 frequencies, and they aren't that broad-spectrum.  The
> >>>one I have has about a 0.3 MHz spectrum coverage in the band, e.g. it
> >>>takes up from 99.1 to 99.4 on the FM dial.
> >>
> >>The one you have is different than mine so I guess I'm wrong...  ;)
> >>
> >>You only need two frequency's, but it would operate faster with 4...
> >
> >Uhh no, you ONLY need 2.  What the heck do you need four frequencies
> >for?  For each calc there's one transmitter, one receiver.  If you use
> >four, you're thinking of transmitting and receiving for EACH linkport
> >wire = dumb and bad :).
> 
> Thats what you'd need to do it without too many components...

Uhhh, Hello McFly... you can add an AVR and resonator, or build an 
extra RF transciever which would require dozens of parts.

Bryan

-- 
Bryan Rittmeyer
mailto:bryanr@flash.net
http://www.flash.net/~bryanr/

References:

Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Re: TI-H: Radio Link revisited

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Prev: Re: TI-H: General questions with a possibly big im
Next: TI-H: Cap Question.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread