Re: Question on the 83 [Re: TI-H: TI-85 Schematic]
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Question on the 83 [Re: TI-H: TI-85 Schematic]
what chips?
>From listown@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Wed Jan 21 19:44:23 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (8.8.8/8.8.7) id EAA18638
> for ti-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 22 Jan 1998 04:40:36 +0100
>Message-Id: <v02110108b0ec591d3776@[206.149.127.65]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:10:09 -0700
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)
>Subject: Re: Question on the 83 [Re: TI-H: TI-85 Schematic]
>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>I think that my chips (25) will come in by friday. If so, I will be
>selling them.
>
>Grant
>
>PS. Rates of above 9600 kill the calc, and sometimes even 9600 can.
It
>will have baud rates of 2400, 4800, and 9600 just because some calcs
(82/3)
>can't handle 9600. The 92 how ever could handle a whole lot more.
>
>>Anyone know if an RS-232 port could be used on the TI-83. If so,
anyone know
>>of any plans, etc. That I could get ahold of?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>jpollack@theonramp.net wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like a great idea, I give a rat's *ss.
>>>
>>> At 09:17 AM 1/19/98 PST, you wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Does anyone realize that Mel Tsai is working on mappin the
schematic of
>>> >the TI-85??? It sounds like he's quitting because no one is asking
for
>>> >it, but did anyone even know about it? I sure as hell would like to
have
>>> >a look at the schematic. There may not be that much use for it, but
it
>>> >would make many tasks easy, such as replacing the
Resistor/Capacitor
>>> >circuit with a REAL quartz crystal Occilator and running the calc
at
>>> >high, accurate frequencys. You could probably EMULATE RS-232 right
from
>>> >the link port with a crystal! Also, it might be possible to improve
the
>>> >link circutry for higher speeds. ROM upgrades may actualy be a
>>> >possibility (doubt it though due to dificulty). Just imagine! He
said
>>> >once that he had much of it done. I've mapped circuit boards
before, but
>>> >mapping something as small as a TI-85 is hell. Even if he isn't
done, he
>>> >could atleast give out the work he does have instead of making us
do it
>>> >all over again if we ever need it. If you want to see the TI-85
>>> >Schematic, LET HIM KNOW!!! I sure as hell want to see it. If anyone
else
>>> >is interested, then let him know that there is _someone_ other than
me,
>>> >who "gives a Rat's *ss about it," to quote him.
>>> >
>>> >If no one cares, then I'll drop it, but imagine the hardware that
could
>>> >be done on it then!
>>> >
>>> >Put "TI-85 schematic" in the subject line so he sees it. He isn't
on the
>>> >list anymore, so if you e-mail him, use his address. I forgot what
it
>>> >was, but I'll also forward them if they are on the list or sent to
me.
>>> >
>>> >Richard Piotter
>>> >richfiles1@hotmail.com
>>> >
>>> >______________________________________________________
>>> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>-----
>>Adam T. Liette
>>kb8ydx@geocities.com
>>http://www.qsl.net/kb8ydx
>>ICQ: 4651859
>
>---
>Grant Stockly
>AppleCyber - http://www.alaska.net/~gussie
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com