Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
huh? make it for the 86? um.... if its for mbus then any calc on the
network could use it...
>From listown@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se Fri Feb 27 16:38:42 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se (8.8.8/8.8.7) id BAA09775
> for ti-hardware-outgoing; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 01:35:00 +0100
>From: "Robert Brack" <reb@netride.com>
>To: <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Subject: Re: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:33:52 -0500
>Message-ID: <01bd43cf$c7fa41c0$76d628cf@robert>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>Sender: owner-ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Errors-To: ti-hardware-errors@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>Who cares about the 85, make one for the 86 :-) Just kidding. Please
do
>though.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Osma Suominen <ozone@clinet.fi>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Friday, February 27, 1998 12:46 PM
>Subject: TI-H: I2C LCD module with MBus
>
>
>>
>>ryan pogge wrote:
>>
>>> I have found that it is possible to have an I2C controlled LCD
modual.
>>> Mbus could use this maybee?
>>
>>Yes, why not. It should support all of the functions in the I2C
protocol.
>>In case something is missing, I'll add it if it's possible.
>>
>>I've thought about porting the MBus routines to be usable with the
Usgard
>>shell instead of ZShell. Among other benefits, the routines could then
be
>>distributed as precompiled .obj libraries, to facilitate programming.
>>The secondary text memory hack would no longer be needed to achieve
high
>>speeds because of the advanced memory management in Usgard. However,
MBus
>>applications would then be incompatible with ZShell and other TI-85
>>shells, unless they support Usgard applications. I could of course
keep
>>two separate versions of the routines, one for ZShell and the other
one
>>for Usgard, but updating two separate distributions would be a bit
>>inconvenient.
>>
>>What are your thoughts about limiting MBus to Usgard on the 85?
>>
>>-Ozone
>>
>>--
>>*** Osma Suominen *** ozone@clinet.fi *** http://www.clinet.fi/~ozone
***
>>
>>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com