Re: TI-H: mind vs. computer

Re: TI-H: mind vs. computer

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 16:33:46 -0900
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <v04020a00b2a3526ad1ab@[24.237.1.209]>
• References: <367C7E26.59F53E8F@earthling.net> <v04020a04b2a1c1999eaa@[24.237.1.209]> <3.0.6.32.19981219144742.007bb9c0@gussie.alaska.net> <19981219100900.C10584@morph.localnet.net> <3.0.6.32.19981218232527.007bb9e0@gussie.alaska.net> <93a8ec4e.367a874a@aol.com> <3.0.6.32.19981218232527.007bb9e0@gussie.alaska.net> <v04020a01b2a20308caee@[24.237.1.209]> <v04020a04b2a2379c2750@[24.237.1.209]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

That reminds me...  If this list were to comply to the RFCs, it would have
the reply address as the sender, not the list address...

How about RFC 792?  Old, but you use it every single day.  The most widely
used RFC there is, i'm sure.

>Or your last two posts...related to RFC.  The DOD has nothing to do with
>electronics.  Just some stupid the government put up, yet that is what
>you'r talking about right now.

• Re: TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Gabe <gabeman@earthling.net>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Jon Olson <morph@jmss.com>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Dan <danti@applecyber.dyndns.com>
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: SHIVANJJS@aol.com
• Re: Re(2): TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
• Re: TI-H: mind vs. computer
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

• Prev: TI-H: 89 security
• Next: TI-H: External Refrence Clock
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread