Re: TI-H: Demolition Calc


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Demolition Calc




>>>> Question 4.
>>>> Do you believe that posession of information that could be
>>>> used to create a device that could harm someone should
>>>> be illegal?
>>>Nope. Seeing and doing are different. If I'm married and I see a
>>>beautiful woman, it's fine. But if I screw her, it's adultery. I think
>>>I'm rambling.
>>
>>But, what if you 'don't inhale'.  :)
>
>
>Or if she touches you but you don't touch her? (by that reasoning
>many people paying prostitutes would not have broken a law).
>
>About Clinton not inhaling, what a wimp, what was he doing,
>showing off for his friends?  Just goes to show that he has
>a history of not being able to fully commit to something.
>I'd have more respect for him if he had said, 'yes, I tried
>it once, I didn't like it'.  At least then we'd know he was
>willing to go through with something and take responsibilty
>for his actions.
>
>>>> Question 5.
>>>> Do you believe that posession of a homebuilt explosive
>>>> device (that does not violate the federal law against
>>>> manufacturing your own explosives, ie, a device that
>>>> uses commercial dynamite, purchased legally, but
>>>> fitted with a homebuilt initator) should be illegal?
>>>Yep, but you have to define explosive. The government might twist that
>>>to make your furnace or anything that ignites be classified as
>>>explosive.
>>
>>Or anything that can hurt someone else.  Like a 700watt grage door opener
>>could realy hurt someone if they were holding on to the antenna.
>
>So posession of something that could hurt someone should be illegal?
>Guns, knives and fists?  Do we need to be certifed in the use of and have
>a license to have steak knives in our homes?

Okay.  Guns can kill food.  But how do you justify a 700watt grage door
opener?  It just may happen that more than one door in the state has the
same code.  :)

Also, that much power could be dangerous...

Grant


Follow-Ups: References: