Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Re(2): TI-H: e(g)




>that is the only thing i havnet been able to pry out of grant's head.  I
>will eventualy examine the code and see what the code requires in the
>schematic.  I don't even know if the e(g) code posted supports the dram/ide
>support.
>
>I don't know.  I havnt had much luck asking grant these questions.

I didn't know you guys realy wanted it.  :)  One guy was joking arround and
listed pages of things to add.


References: