Re: TI-H: I'M DOUMB!

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: I'M DOUMB!
From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 16:59:46 -0400
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <v0211012eb169b36bb6c7@[206.149.127.65]>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Actually, the only reason Mel's ESF was faster than
the EuP was because TI seriously botched up the TI
byte send/rec routines in the ROM. I have a feeling
if I rewrite them I can see a significant improvement
in throughput. It won't match ESF speed, of course,
but it won't have any of those odd problems that ESF
owners occasionally experience.

Bryan

Grant Stockly wrote:
> 
> I'm going to not port the EII driver to the 85, but port the EII to the 85!
> There is already a driver for the 85 that thinks its on a serial flash
> ram, well, if I make the AVR an interceptor that just translates the block
> number into a usable number on the other flash it would work!
> 
> I hope national still has product info for that chip on their page...  If
> someone can find that info, I'll make it.
> 
> And if bryan and I get together, we could make two modes...one for 8x calcs
> and one for the 92.  btw, since the 8x calcs won't use the ti protocall,
> the 8x expander will be faster...  :) hehehe

References:

TI-H: I'M DOUMB!

From: gussie@alaska.net (Grant Stockly)

Prev: Re: TI-H: Re: I love Grant Stockly.
Next: TI-H: Re: PDF was sent already???
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread