Re: TI-H: New TI


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: New TI



Matthew Andersen wrote:
> 
> I remember hearing good things about the RISC chips... but, not to play
> on the name, arn't they still a little unstable or not all perfect...
> correct me if i'm wrong (and with my day its likly). Also RISC just
> doesn't sound like a good chip to put into something that you are
> selling to the public... NOT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS.... hehe

TI has never before stated that a processor was CISC based on the
box...maybe in the website documentation, but most people smart enough
to find that know what it means.  :)

So why would they even advertise that it was RISC?  Just advertising
something beyond the traditional 6Mhz would be great!

-- 
    Jake Robb     Email:jake@netrus.net
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 < "Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice >
 <  doggy' until you can find a rock."   >
 <  -Unknown                             >
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


References: