Re: TI-H: maybe there is another way

Re: TI-H: maybe there is another way

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org, ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• From: "Joseph C. Bender" <aa807@detroit.freenet.org>
• Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 13:33:21 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <3439F2F0.EDE02EB9@chicoma.la.unm.edu>
• References: <3.0.3.32.19971007110306.0069ba24@detroit.freenet.org>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

At 09:29 AM 10/7/97 +0000, Matthew H. Fogle wrote:
>>         49 MHz anyone?
>
>That's exactly what my new design uses! The problem is I think the chips
>I am planning on using are already obsolete... I  am trying to find a
>source.
>
	Do you have an available diagram to check out or is this *design* like so
many others just smoke and mirrors?  A block diagram would work just fine.
Regards, 

J. Bender

Joseph C. Bender, 	N8XRE          |  AX.25:  N8XRE@WB8SWF.#SEMI.MI.USA.NA
mailto:  aa807@detroit.freenet.org |  PGP MAIL ENABLED/PREFERRED
ICQ UIN:  398486                          |  Key at keyserv or
mailto:jcbpgp@mutiny.net
Personal Page:  <http://www.mutiny.net/personal/jcbender> 
antispam:  admin@localhost 	postmaster@localhost    root@[127.0.0.1]
{Jesus saves!  But Yzerman SCOOOORES on the rebound!}

• TI-H: RF-link parts needed.
• From: "Matthew H. Fogle" <cs239ac@chicoma.la.unm.edu>

• RE: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• From: "Joseph C. Bender" <aa807@detroit.freenet.org>
• Re: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• From: "Matthew H. Fogle" <cs239ac@chicoma.la.unm.edu>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: maybe there is another way
• Next: Re: TI-H: Missed a cpl of days.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread