Re: TI-H: ti-turbo

Subject: Re: TI-H: ti-turbo
From: Zenon Lynx <Zenon@bbs.nexes.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 17:12:26 -0600
In-Reply-To: <TI-H: ti-turbo>

Okay.  You got a program for that?  Then we can all benchmark our calcs.


"This is the most logical route, Captain"
-= Zenon@bbs.nexes.com =-


----------
: From: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
: To: Zenon
: Subject: Re: TI-H: ti-turbo
: Date: October 25, 1996 1:20 PM
: 
: 
: 
: 
: ----------
: > From: Zenon Lynx <Zenon@bbs.nexes.com>
: > To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
: > Subject: Re: TI-H: ti-turbo
: > Date: Thursday, October 24, 1996 11:43 PM
: > 
: > Just because you don't understand that MY calc don't use up extra power
: > because of turbo doesn't mean that it isn't so.  Don't you know there
are
: > other theories out there that are more correct and factual than yours?
: > 
: > "This is the most logical route, Captain"
: > -= Zenon@bbs.nexes.com =-
: > 
: Since you claim your calculator not to use extra power try this:  Buy
eight
: (8) batteries (identical)  Take 4 of them, put them in your calc.  Then
run
: an endless loop, doing rigorous calculations and such within the loop,
and
: time how long it takes.  Record that number.  Repeat the procedure with a
: turboed calc, then record the result.  If your  calcualtor does not waste
: energy in turbo, then the times should be very close.  
: 
: Mike
:

References:

From: