Re: TI-H: Back to backlighting!


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: Back to backlighting!



So how does one simply (I stress simply) stup up the 6v to 120v at a safe
amperage?


----------
> From: C.J. Oster <cjo@pobox.com>
> To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: TI-H: Back to backlighting!
> Date: Sunday, November 24, 1996 8:32 PM
> 
> It all works the same way as indeglo.  You have to run A LOT of voltage
> through it to make it light up.  The more voltage, the brighter it lights
> up.  The amperage really doesn't matter, that's how it works in watches.
> The 3v from the battery is steped up to a few hundred at a very small
> amperage.
> 
> >I found one of those Lime-lights. The small compact green night-light
for
> >those that didn't see the post. Anyway, I dismantled it and what I found
> >was better than I had hoped. The thing is made out of a little card with
> >a negative and positive terminal. The card is thinner than a credit card
> >and smaller than the TI-screen. Unfortunately, it plugs into the 120
volt
> >socket. I was hoping that it didn't need so much voltage and that
> >resistors stepped it down, but there was nothing in the casing except
the
> >"glow-card." Attaching the little thing to a nine-volt may have made it
> >glow a little if I wasn't imagining things. This would be perfect to
> >stick in the calc, but we need MORE POWER! If anyone has any ideas to
get
> >this thing to work in the calc on 6 volts, let's hear it! I don't know a
> >lot about electronics so even the smallest thought would be welcome.
This
> >is for all of us, so let's hear what people have to say.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >.\\ark
> >Markzshell@juno.com    <can't attach files to this address>
> >Zarkon1000@aol.com      <checked much less frequently>
> 
> 
> 
> ********************************************************************
> Unsolicited commercial e-mail to the poster of this message
> will be proofread at $70/hr, minimum charge $150.  Submission
> of such e-mail to this address will suffice as contractual assent
> to the said charging schedule.
> ********************************************************************
> 
>  
> 


References: