Re: TI-H: What we need to concentrate on with the RF
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
> 1. Lets stop talking about the IR link, it's not as affective as the
> RF link.
It is just as effective for short distances, and a _lot_ less
complicated to design and build, so we shouldn't drop the idea
entirely. But I agree that the RF link should still be the primary
focus.
> 2. A two calc radio connection (not 3 or more)
No real reason for this if a different protocol is used. But that
will not require a new physical design anyway, so we can worry about
that later. The TI protocol of course will only support two calcs.
> For an issue link this, e-mail is rediculus. We need a full IRC telnet,
> (MUD) type chat area to disscuss the RF link. It would be nice if there
> were more chat area's link this. If Mangus is listening, please, this
> would be very nice and we could get things done much faster.
I agree that a real-time discussion would be _much_ more productive
than email. But why telnet? Why not just IRC? Maybe a #TI-Hardware
channel on EFnet (or another network), similar to #calc-ti.
shakal@ns.net
References: