Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: 0.1 capticitor
>At 09:28 PM 12/9/96 EST, you wrote:
>>
>>>I have been wondering for months where to find a smaller cap, and I
>>>recently realised that something that small may actually overclock the
>>>TI-85. If you wan those speeds, just take out c9 and leave it empty.
>>
>>If one was to do this, then the wave being sent to the Z80 would be
>>totally flat, and would have no pulse in order to regulate it's internal
>>clock. Therefore, the Z80 would freeze, and possibly be ruined.
>>
>>Neat idea, tho. =)
>>
>> - J. Bishop
>>
>>
>Actualy it works fine..............mr. electronics expert.
>make sure you know what you are talking about befor you tell someone they
>are wrong,
>cause you are wrong.
>it does not freez and is not ruined.
>takeing out the c9 works great.
I'm just taking a wild guess here, but I think that completely removing C9
will only work on either the CE version or the original (I'm not sure
which) and that removing it on the other will crash the calc. Check the
back of your 85 to find out which version you have, then post the results
if it worked to remove it completely
*************************************************************************
* __ *
* |||||| ||| |||||| |||| ||| /_/\ *
* || || || || || || || || || / /\ \ *
* ||||| || || ||||| || || || / /\ \ \ *
* || ||||||| || || || || || || / / /\ \ \ *
* |||| || || |||||| ||||||| ||| / / / \ \ \ *
* / /_/____\ \ \ *
* Pablo XXX /_/________\_\/\ *
* rmay@esu3.esu3.k12.ne.us \_\___________\/ *
* *
*************************************************************************
References: