[TIB] Re: DOS programming
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[TIB] Re: DOS programming
Well... on my linux machine, I intend to never endorse commercial
software... so I never use Wine b/c that is to run windows software and most
of which is commercial, second of all, I use linux native EXT2 filesystems
for linux, who would EVER use anything other than a linux FS?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Mohr" <mohr.42@osu.edu>
To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 4:59 PM
Subject: [TIB] Re: DOS programming
> If Windows 2000/XP is the Windows installation he's referring to, then
> it is harder to get Wine working just because it's a pain to mount NTFS.
> I overcame it by just reinstalling XP on a FAT32 partition. If you
> have gotten NTFS to mount (and it shouldn't take too much effort, I'm
> just lazy), and you have wine, "man wine" should tell you everything you
> need.
>
> Gary Sparkes wrote:
> > wine? hard to configure? where did you hear this?
> > RTFM! that's all i have to say on this subject
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nick Peaden" <Nitrocloud@earthlink.net>
> > To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 1:39 PM
> > Subject: [TIB] Re: DOS programming
> >
> >
> >
> >>I have Linux... it's great AND free... I have windows on this to play
> >
> > games,
> >
> >>b/c I heard Wine was hard to configure.
> >>"It's a Windows world out there, and for those who get through you have
> >>Linux"
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Robert Mohr" <mohr.42@osu.edu>
> >>To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
> >>Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 12:47 PM
> >>Subject: [TIB] Re: DOS programming
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>The real question is do you still use Microsoft products? I don't
> >>
> >>anymore.
> >>
> >>>Nick Peaden wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I feel a mutation to an Anti-Microsoft thread... YAY... REVOLT
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> *From:* Jeremy Butcher <mailto:jtkirk86@bellsouth.net>
> >>>> *To:* ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org <mailto:ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
> >>>> *Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2003 12:17 PM
> >>>> *Subject:* [TIB] Re: DOS programming
> >>>>
> >>>> Lol yea they can take the blame
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> *From:* ti-basic-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
> >>>> <mailto:ti-basic-bounce@lists.ticalc.org>
> >>>> [mailto:ti-basic-bounce@lists.ticalc.org] *On Behalf Of
> >>>> *MyOwnLittlWorld@aol.com <mailto:MyOwnLittlWorld@aol.com>
> >>>> *Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2003 8:58 AM
> >>>> *To:* ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org <mailto:ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
> >>>> *Subject:* [TIB] Re: DOS programming
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In a message dated 5/11/2003 12:23:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> >>>> travisevans@cox.net writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Arrgh... sorry about the double-post. I know I didn't send the
> >
> > message
> >
> >>>>> twice, so it must be Microsoft's fault. ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Oops, now I feel really stupid. :-) I didn't send a double-post
> >>>> after all, I
> >>>> just sent two different messages with the exact same subject line
> >
> > at
> >
> >>the
> >>
> >>>> exact same time in quick succession and I thought it was a
> >>>> double-post. So
> >>>> just ignore this whole thing. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> --Travis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Don't worry, we'll still blame microsoft.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nick
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> >>>> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >>>> Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 - Release Date: 5/6/2003
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>---
> >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >>Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 - Release Date: 5/6/2003
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 - Release Date: 5/6/2003
Follow-Ups:
References: