Re: TIB: getting new calc

To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: TIB: getting new calc
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:10:17 -0600
Organization: HomeTech
References: <20000208205745.15139.qmail@web904.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


You must not know.  The 89 and the 92+ essentially have the exact same
operating system on each calc.  Practically the only difference between the
89 and the 92+ are it's form (vertical vs horizontal), keys and screen size.
The 92 is similar to the 89/92+, but with much less memory than even the 86.

What are your reasons for suggesting a 92 over an 89 or even an 86!?

-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: kilier2
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Gowdy" <pandrogas@yahoo.com>
To: <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: TIB: getting new calc

> go for the 86.  The 89 might confuse you if your
> trying for a lofty goal in a quick amount of time.
> I'd suggest a 92 but those are confusing as hell.

References:

Re: TIB: getting new calc

From: Matthew Gowdy <pandrogas@yahoo.com>