Re: TIB: Let's work together...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TIB: Let's work together...
I respect your ideas but for those who don't see this movement that
way, it is kind of imposing. Those who would like this to develop into
something new and more productive can join. No one is forcing you to
do so.
Our society is based on the freedom of making your own choice. While
your own choice may not be the same as others, you must respect theirs
as it is their own.
In a way, I agree with you. This group gives the chance to even
beginner BASIC programmers to learn a little more about the language.
Far be it from me to say that products created by groups are always
excellent, but for the most part they are all worthwhile.
Mind you that I do not disrespect you. In fact, I admire you for
voicing your opinion. Maybe you swayed others judgement. That's fine
with me.
-----Original Message-----
From: MathWiz314@aol.com <MathWiz314@aol.com>
To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: TIB: Let's work together...
>
>Let's work together...Sickening
>
>Why work together? The last thing the TI-Community needs is more
comradery.
>By working together you lower standards and put limits on original
ideas.
>Without competition for who makings something the best, people are
less likely
>to put as much effort into the work because people will use their
program
>because it is the only one in existance. Additionally, people will
have to
>work all on one project creating confusion and disorder. They will
have to
>divide up a project into different topics and be able to bring them
together
>for the final product. And if their is a flaw in that product who
will be
>held accountable? It would much simplier not form groups and just
individuals
>handle the whole program themself. If that person needed help, he
should just
>ask someone, not turn over the whole project to some else.
>Consolidating all power into one large while crushing the small
timers is just
>like what Micro$oft did. Is that the future of TI-BASIC too?
>