Re: TIB: Random Number Generation Different From The One Before
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TIB: Random Number Generation Different From The One Before
Not just that, but it's also slow as heck; I know, I've used it.
(and I do read the manual, Kellers, I just haven't done it in a while.... my
mistake, sorry about that!)
--Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: The Garth Johnson <gbjohnson@yahoo.com>
To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: TIB: Random Number Generation Different From The One Before
>
>>
>> If you do want a random integer (on the 86) why not use randint?
>The syntax
>> is randint(lower bound,upper bound) and it returns an integer
>between lower
>> and upper inclusive. So you type randint(1,24)->C.
>> PJC
>
>wouldn't that give the possibility of having some numbers repeat?
>
>==
>
>The Garth Johnson
>
>Visit my website! http://www.bigfoot.com/~garthjohnson
> "Now with jokes for your mental enjoyment!"
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>