Re: TIB: 86->85

To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TIB: 86->85
From: BrncAvFan2@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 17:05:53 EST
Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 11/6/1998 2:47:09 PM Mountain Standard Time,
jglover@geocities.com writes:

<< >and also, the getky command is slow.  you might be able to optimize
 >your routine and get it to go a little faster, but if the code uses
 >getky it is going to be slow. >>

I saw a faster (it looked like to me) getky routine at Dimensions TI's
programming tutorials at http://calc.ml.org/lessons/basteq.html
There is a section called faster getky.  Try it and tell us if it is indeed
faster.

Dan

Prev: Re: TIB: 86->85
Next: Re: TIB: 86->85
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread