Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These




>In a message dated 6/3/98 8:54:08 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
>gussie@alaska.net writes:
>
>> >In a message dated 6/2/98 10:12:25 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
>> >gussie@alaska.net writes:
>> >
>> >>Grant Stockly wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >> At 07:13 PM 6/2/98 EDT, you wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >> >> um, how did this go from a BASIC list to a discution of
>> >physics??
>> > >> >> >> >> >> (not that I mind, I'm just wondering)
>> > >> >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> >> >BASIC?!  What a stupid topic for a mailing list...
>> > >> >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> >> Easy....
>> > >> >> >> >> Scorched Earth for TI-BASIC -> Algorithms for trajectory and
>> > >>height ->
> > >> >> >> >> Flames for incorrect algorithms -> Reverse flames that prove
> > >>they are
> > >> >> >>right
> > >> >> >> >> from Physics class -> Message asking how a BASIC discussion
>went
> >to
> > >> >> >>Physics
> > >> >> >> >> -> My reply -> Someone flaming me for following the incorrect
> > >> >>pathway that
> > >> >> >> >> brought us here this far and giving another pathway -> Someone
> >else
> > >> >> >>flaming
> > >> >> >> >> the person who flamed me and saying that we're both wrong and
> > >> >>fixing the
> > >> >> >> >> incorrect mistakes of both people to what they remember being
> > >> >>discussed ->
> > >> >> >> >> ......
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> You get the picture :)
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >>                  Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
> > >> >> >> >> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow
> > >>programmers"
> > >> >> >> >>          http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
> > >> >> >> >>                     http://shinelight.home.ml.org
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >  Well, so much for trying to make a joke, and NO ONE HAS ANY
> > >> >>OPINION ON MY
> > >> >> >> >PROGING SOUND IN BASIC (86)!!!
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> No sound in basic...
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >  are you so sure? I am working on a MIDI type prog now (ok, ok,
>your
> > >> >> >right, I use
> > >> >> >a little ASM for actually playing a sound, but the rest is basic)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> You aren't doing it in basic then...
> > >> >
> > >> >  What I ment was that I figured out how to use a little asm for a
>basic
> > >> >prog, I had
> > >> >to devlope a new adapter to get it to work, and the finnished resilt
>will
> > >> >be very
> > >> >cool.  Man, I am trying to expand the capabilitys of the language and
>all
> > >> >I get is
> > >> >flames.
> > >>
> > >> I'not flaming you...  I'm just too much of a hardware guy to let simple
> > >> things such as MIDI go to things which would be more like 'Beep Table'.
> >:)
> > >>
> > >> If a MIDI adaptor were made, that'd be cool...  I'd like to hook my
>Yahama
> > >> wave table box to my calc but it wouldn't be practical...  :(
> > >
> > >  Hey, no prob, I know I have a hot temper.  But I use a lot of terms
> > >lightly, and
> > >I did make a adapter for listing to sound on a calc, without having to go
> > >into a
> > >shell (like Zshell, on the 85 you would have to use ZBasic or something
> > >like it).
> >> >You know what I'm talking about if you have fooled much with PlayWav.
> >> >It's really
> >> >simple, and I might have it done in a week or so.
> >>
> >> PlayWav??  Oh yeah...  I ported it to the 83...
> >>
>> >> Only one problem...  Its not good...  Make a driver for a DAC then you've
>> >> got something...  :)
>> >
>> >I know!!  LETS SEE HOW MANY TIMES WE CAN QUOTE THE SAME
>> >LETTER WITHOUT REMOVING THE UNIMPORTANT PARTS
>> >THAT WE HAVE ALL SKIPPED OVER SO MANY TIMES THAT WE
>> >HAVE THEM MEMORIZED!!!
>>
>> We could do that, or just keep on posting pointless stuff to the bottom of
>> messages...  :)
>
>That's a good idea.

I know.