Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC prog

Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs o

• To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs o
• From: TGaArdvark@aol.com
• Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 19:42:36 EDT
• Delivered-To: ti-basic-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org

> How about having several categories to rate the programs by?  have a
> compactness of the programming (if the author did everything using the
> least amount of code possible), the usefulness of a program (could be
> how fun a game is), and some other category.
> 
> Instead of having a 4/5 star system, use a 3 star.  It would be a
> yes/no/sorta system if the author did whatever the criteria are.

You can only fit so much in 640 pixels.  And that just means more
work.  I agree that this would be the best system if it were not so
much more work than the others.  3 stars is a smart idea.  Maybe
some other picture might be better though so people will expect
3 instead of 4 or 5.  Maybe thumbs up or something... Dunno.

• Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs o
• From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>

• Prev: Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These
• Next: Re: TIB: Re: Re: Fw: Ponder These [offlist]
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread