Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These




>In a message dated 6/2/98 10:12:25 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
>gussie@alaska.net writes:
>
>>Grant Stockly wrote:
> >>
> >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> At 07:13 PM 6/2/98 EDT, you wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> um, how did this go from a BASIC list to a discution of
>physics??
> >> >> >> >> >> (not that I mind, I'm just wondering)
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >BASIC?!  What a stupid topic for a mailing list...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Easy....
> >> >> >> >> Scorched Earth for TI-BASIC -> Algorithms for trajectory and
> >>height ->
> >> >> >> >> Flames for incorrect algorithms -> Reverse flames that prove
> >>they are
> >> >> >>right
> >> >> >> >> from Physics class -> Message asking how a BASIC discussion went
>to
> >> >> >>Physics
> >> >> >> >> -> My reply -> Someone flaming me for following the incorrect
> >> >>pathway that
> >> >> >> >> brought us here this far and giving another pathway -> Someone
>else
> >> >> >>flaming
> >> >> >> >> the person who flamed me and saying that we're both wrong and
> >> >>fixing the
> >> >> >> >> incorrect mistakes of both people to what they remember being
> >> >>discussed ->
> >> >> >> >> ......
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> You get the picture :)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>                  Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
> >> >> >> >> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow
> >>programmers"
> >> >> >> >>          http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
> >> >> >> >>                     http://shinelight.home.ml.org
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >  Well, so much for trying to make a joke, and NO ONE HAS ANY
> >> >>OPINION ON MY
> >> >> >> >PROGING SOUND IN BASIC (86)!!!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> No sound in basic...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  are you so sure? I am working on a MIDI type prog now (ok, ok, your
> >> >> >right, I use
> >> >> >a little ASM for actually playing a sound, but the rest is basic)
> >> >>
> >> >> You aren't doing it in basic then...
> >> >
> >> >  What I ment was that I figured out how to use a little asm for a basic
> >> >prog, I had
> >> >to devlope a new adapter to get it to work, and the finnished resilt will
> >> >be very
> >> >cool.  Man, I am trying to expand the capabilitys of the language and all
> >> >I get is
> >> >flames.
> >>
> >> I'not flaming you...  I'm just too much of a hardware guy to let simple
> >> things such as MIDI go to things which would be more like 'Beep Table'.
>:)
> >>
> >> If a MIDI adaptor were made, that'd be cool...  I'd like to hook my Yahama
> >> wave table box to my calc but it wouldn't be practical...  :(
> >
> >  Hey, no prob, I know I have a hot temper.  But I use a lot of terms
> >lightly, and
> >I did make a adapter for listing to sound on a calc, without having to go
> >into a
> >shell (like Zshell, on the 85 you would have to use ZBasic or something
> >like it).
>> >You know what I'm talking about if you have fooled much with PlayWav.
>> >It's really
>> >simple, and I might have it done in a week or so.
>>
>> PlayWav??  Oh yeah...  I ported it to the 83...
>>
>> Only one problem...  Its not good...  Make a driver for a DAC then you've
>> got something...  :)
>
>I know!!  LETS SEE HOW MANY TIMES WE CAN QUOTE THE SAME
>LETTER WITHOUT REMOVING THE UNIMPORTANT PARTS
>THAT WE HAVE ALL SKIPPED OVER SO MANY TIMES THAT WE
>HAVE THEM MEMORIZED!!!

We could do that, or just keep on posting pointless stuff to the bottom of
messages...  :)