Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TIB: Re: Fw: Ponder These




>Grant Stockly wrote:
>
>> >Grant Stockly wrote:
>> >
>> >> >Grant Stockly wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> >Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> At 07:13 PM 6/2/98 EDT, you wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> um, how did this go from a BASIC list to a discution of physics??
>> >> >> >> >> (not that I mind, I'm just wondering)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >BASIC?!  What a stupid topic for a mailing list...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Easy....
>> >> >> >> Scorched Earth for TI-BASIC -> Algorithms for trajectory and
>>height ->
>> >> >> >> Flames for incorrect algorithms -> Reverse flames that prove
>>they are
>> >> >>right
>> >> >> >> from Physics class -> Message asking how a BASIC discussion went to
>> >> >>Physics
>> >> >> >> -> My reply -> Someone flaming me for following the incorrect
>> >>pathway that
>> >> >> >> brought us here this far and giving another pathway -> Someone else
>> >> >>flaming
>> >> >> >> the person who flamed me and saying that we're both wrong and
>> >>fixing the
>> >> >> >> incorrect mistakes of both people to what they remember being
>> >>discussed ->
>> >> >> >> ......
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You get the picture :)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>                  Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
>> >> >> >> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow
>>programmers"
>> >> >> >>          http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
>> >> >> >>                     http://shinelight.home.ml.org
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >  Well, so much for trying to make a joke, and NO ONE HAS ANY
>> >>OPINION ON MY
>> >> >> >PROGING SOUND IN BASIC (86)!!!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No sound in basic...
>> >> >
>> >> >  are you so sure? I am working on a MIDI type prog now (ok, ok, your
>> >> >right, I use
>> >> >a little ASM for actually playing a sound, but the rest is basic)
>> >>
>> >> You aren't doing it in basic then...
>> >
>> >  What I ment was that I figured out how to use a little asm for a basic
>> >prog, I had
>> >to devlope a new adapter to get it to work, and the finnished resilt will
>> >be very
>> >cool.  Man, I am trying to expand the capabilitys of the language and all
>> >I get is
>> >flames.
>>
>> I'not flaming you...  I'm just too much of a hardware guy to let simple
>> things such as MIDI go to things which would be more like 'Beep Table'.  :)
>>
>> If a MIDI adaptor were made, that'd be cool...  I'd like to hook my Yahama
>> wave table box to my calc but it wouldn't be practical...  :(
>
>  Hey, no prob, I know I have a hot temper.  But I use a lot of terms
>lightly, and
>I did make a adapter for listing to sound on a calc, without having to go
>into a
>shell (like Zshell, on the 85 you would have to use ZBasic or something
>like it).
>You know what I'm talking about if you have fooled much with PlayWav.
>It's really
>simple, and I might have it done in a week or so.

PlayWav??  Oh yeah...  I ported it to the 83...

Only one problem...  Its not good...  Make a driver for a DAC then you've
got something...  :)