TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs on ticalc.org
This might be a bit labor intensive, but how about creating a second
directory tree for the good ones. Every one gets posted in one, and the
good programs get put in both.
Just a thought,
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Allen <eallen@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>
To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org <ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, May 31, 1998 4:40 PM
Subject: TIB: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC
programs on ticalc.org
>
>I like the idea. You should also delete the programs that do nothing. For
>example I think I saw one once that just did the arcsic/cos/tan of a number
>which can easily be done without a program.
>
>For the programs like the quadratic it might be good to take one of the
>better built ones and add all the functions in the others to make one
really
>good program but still keep a few of the good small ones for those more
>interested in memory.
>
>Eli Allen
>eallen@bcpl.net
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
>> [mailto:owner-ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Bryan Rabeler
>>
>>
>> I've been thinking about not accepting & archiving ALL basic programs on
>> ticalc.org. I hate having like 10 minesweepers for 82 basic or
>> whatever. Or 10 quadratic formula programs for 82 basic. I think there
>> should only be one or two good ones so that the user can quickly get a
>> program and know its good, instead of having to weed through 10 of
>> them. So my proposal is to delete some of the not-very useful programs
>> in order to prevent the archives from being diluted with worthless
>> programs. What do you all think?
>>
>> --
>> Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>> File Archives
>> the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Follow-Ups: