Re: TIB: wieghted dice

To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TIB: wieghted dice
From: Arno.Kizina@t-online.de (Arno Kizina)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 01:33:48 +0100
References: <34CC90E9.3B6E@alaska.net> <34CD11B0.FF6@daimi.aau.dk>
Reply-To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org


Well think of the holes in the dice, on perfect dice they are filled with the 
accurate amount of colour, so that there is no side prefered, but the dice 
usually sold are cheap, and so the 6 isn't as heavy as the 1.
		A.K.
Rene Kragh Pedersen schrieb:
>
> Jody wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > You'll need ~1500 rolls before it is statistically significant [1]
> > >
> > How is it possible that higher numbers have a greater probability than
> > lower ones - even if it is small? If you have perfectly even dice,
> > isn't it even chance of any number?
>
> You're asking the wrong guy, I just asked that very same question. I
> play a lot with dice probabilities, and I'd hate to see that my reality
> has changed ;-)
>
> -- 
>           Rene Kragh Pedersen
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> man: Why did you get a divorce?
> man:: Too many arguments.

Follow-Ups:

Re: TIB: wieghted dice

From: Rene Kragh Pedersen <u971168@daimi.aau.dk>

References:

TIB: wieghted dice

From: Jody <jody1@alaska.net>

Re: TIB: wieghted dice

From: Rene Kragh Pedersen <u971168@daimi.aau.dk>