Re: SD: Re: Linux 68k?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SD: Re: Linux 68k?
well grant, the page that i saw says its not up yet. hmm.
> The linux-m68k kernel IS booting. The www page you download it from is
> running linux-m68k on a Centris 650!
>
> I run the entire OS! It supports 11 or so Macs!
>
>
>> yes, the linux-m68k kernel is close to booting. you must be talking about
>> something else. I know BSD is more popular. I use it too.
>>
>> --
>> M M IIIII TTTTT CCC H H OOO
>> MM MM I T C C H H O O
>> M M M I T C HHHHH O O
>> M M I T C C H H O O
>> M M IIIII T CCC H H OOO
>>
>> "Microsoft; It's time to call that lame, hack of a company what it is: a
>> lame, hack of a company." - Prison Guy (Rob), Editor, MacAddict
>>
>> on 01/08/2000 09:20 PM, Grant Stockly at gussie@stockly.com wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Close to booting!&?!
>>>
>>> What do you know!
>>>
>>> There are 2 different dists for 68k (020 and higher) macs.
>>>
>>> Running and serving around the world.
>>>
>>> BSD is more popular.
>>>
>>> Btw, I don't mean to offend.
>>>
>>> Grant
>>>
>>>
>>>> There also is a close-to-booting Linux/Mac68K version that runs on the 68K
>>>> Macs. That kernel might work too. But then again, was the 89/92 processor
>>>> really a Motorola 68K?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> M M IIIII TTTTT CCC H H OOO
>>>> MM MM I T C C H H O O
>>>> M M M I T C HHHHH O O
>>>> M M I T C C H H O O
>>>> M M IIIII T CCC H H OOO
>>>>
>>>> "Do what you can,with what you have,where you are" -***** Roosevelt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on 01/08/2000 08:48 PM, Jimmy Baker at ashbar83@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> a TI89/92(+) version to be exact. Basically, if you
>>>>> could install Linux on your calc, and configure it
>>>>> right, you could do a whole lot with it. If we could
>>>>> run a modified Linux, we would effectively turn it
>>>>> into a full featured palmtop computer with more
>>>>> functionality and power than the Palm. It would make
>>>>> development a lot easier, for one thing. Just some
>>>>> thoughts...
>>>>>
>>>>> Jimmy
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Dines Justesen <dines@aub.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am guessing that you are suggesting a Ti9x linux
>>>>>> version, true? It would
>>>>>> be cool to have a version of linux on your calc, but
>>>>>> it really be that
>>>>>> useful? How often do you need multitasking and other
>>>>>> functions like that,
>>>>>> and what would it do which the shell doesn't already
>>>>>> do?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dines
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Jimmy Baker" <ashbar83@yahoo.com>
>>>>>> To: <shell-developers@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>>> Sent: 7. januar 2000 05:07
>>>>>> Subject: SD: Linux 68k?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's try this again. this page has source to a
>>>>>>> bootable Linux port to an Atari ST.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~pcoene/index.html
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>>>> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>>>>>> http://im.yahoo.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>>>> http://im.yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: