Re: SD: Discontinue Shell-Developers?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SD: Discontinue Shell-Developers?
I mean don't be so forceful about staying on topic
~Adamman
In a message dated 98-07-13 12:57:58 EDT, you write:
> Why not? My point was we should either use Shell-Developers or discontinue
> it.
>
> --
> Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
> the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
> ADAMMAN106@aol.com wrote:
>
> > PLEASE don't do that
> >
> > ~Adamman
> >
> > In a message dated 98-07-13 09:50:58 EDT, you write:
> >
> > > Patrick Sweeney wrote:
> > >
> > > > But that kind of stuff SHOULD be discussed here. Noone ver talked
> about
> > > the work
> > > > they were doing on there shells!
> > > > -Patrick
> > > >
> > > > Bryan Rabeler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > GHOUSTBOY@aol.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > no with the new ti-89's coming up people will need to keep
> > > communication with
> > > > > > each other so that it will be easier to make a shell
> > > > >
> > > > > No one uses this list for stuff like Ash 3.1 Beta discussion or
> > anything
> > > like
> > > > > that. Stuff like this usually gets discussed on the assembly
lists.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > > > > File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
> > > > > the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> > >
> > > Then I will be more forceful in making people stay on topic on the
> assembly
> > > lists.
> > > And make them come here to discuss shell stuff.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > > File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
> > > the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
Follow-Ups: