Re: SD: Discontinue Shell-Developers?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SD: Discontinue Shell-Developers?
Why not? My point was we should either use Shell-Developers or discontinue it.
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
ADAMMAN106@aol.com wrote:
> PLEASE don't do that
>
> ~Adamman
>
> In a message dated 98-07-13 09:50:58 EDT, you write:
>
> > Patrick Sweeney wrote:
> >
> > > But that kind of stuff SHOULD be discussed here. Noone ver talked about
> > the work
> > > they were doing on there shells!
> > > -Patrick
> > >
> > > Bryan Rabeler wrote:
> > >
> > > > GHOUSTBOY@aol.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > no with the new ti-89's coming up people will need to keep
> > communication with
> > > > > each other so that it will be easier to make a shell
> > > >
> > > > No one uses this list for stuff like Ash 3.1 Beta discussion or
> anything
> > like
> > > > that. Stuff like this usually gets discussed on the assembly lists.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > > > File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
> > > > the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> >
> > Then I will be more forceful in making people stay on topic on the assembly
> > lists.
> > And make them come here to discuss shell stuff.
> >
> > --
> > Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
> > the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
References: