Re: SD: Basic shells

To: shell-developers@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: SD: Basic shells
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 15:36:33 -0500
References: <971123153527_447312017@mrin45.mail.aol.com>
Reply-To: shell-developers@lists.ticalc.org



TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 97-11-23 14:45:25 EST, you write:
>
> << Theres really no such thing as a basic shell.
>
>
> okay l mean GUIs then.
> why aren't Basic _GUIs_ shells then?

Because basic is very inefficient compared to assembly.  It runs much
slower and you can't do as much as in assembly.

--
Bryan Rabeler
the ticalc.org project
----------------------
brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us
brabeler@ticalc.org
-------------------
ICQ UIN # 1229209
WWW Pager: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/1229209
-------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:

Re: SD: Basic shells

From: Keith Burzinski <tsk3000@prodigy.net>

References:

Re: SD: Basic shells

From: TurboSoft@aol.com