Re: The (new) TI-92 plus
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The (new) TI-92 plus
The TI-92 Plus module was released in June of 1998, but AMS 1.01 is dated
August 5, 1998. So you say TI had to update the AMS to be compatible with
the TI-89's original release? So AMS 1.00 on the TI-89 is "equal" to 1.01
on the TI-92 Plus? And then when the new TI-92 Plus calculators came out,
they were HW2 along with the new TI-89 HW2's.. and thus AMS 1.05 had to be
created. Did the new TI-92 Plus and the HW2 TI-89's come out at the same
time?
--
Bryan Rabeler
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.msu.edu/~rabelerb/
"I personally guarantee that there will be no 'censorship' of what he [Bryan
Rabeler] writes (as long as he keepts to the rules about such things as
language used)." - Magnus Hagander, 5 March 1999
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Kremer" <raykremer@HOTMAIL.COM>
To: <CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM>
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 1999 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: The (new) TI-92 plus
> As I understnad it:
> TI-92+ AMS 1.00 = Plus Module original release
> TI-89 AMS 1.00/TI-92+ AMS 1.01 = TI-89 original release
> AMS 1.05 = Hardware 2.00 original release. Note that all the new TI-92
> Pluses are Hardware 2.00, the 89 was redone in Hardware 2.00 as well.
> AMS 2.03 = First official release of AMS 2.x by TI.
>
> >I thought AMS 1.01 was introduced for the TI-92 Plus just to support the
> new
> >calculator, not the 92 w/plus module, but the one with it built-in.
>
> ******************************************************************
> * To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
> * with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
> *
> * Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
> ******************************************************************
>
******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************
References: