Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Symbolic math for the Ti 86 ?



>why not use small-C to wright it then.
>
As I see it the problem is not the capacity of the calc nor the languages,
but laziness - and of course I understand! Who do you think will spend maybe
thousand hours writing a program you can't make money of? I don't and maybe
can't (newer written in assembly yet)
I've seen nothing but bad excuses yet.

Kasper


References: