Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Slow TI89? What about TI92 PLUS?
Faster to use? I think the 92 is slower to use, a lot of the standard
functions are buried in menus, instead of on the keypad
Tom wrote:
>
> The people who say their slow are doing things like running empty
> loops. In real life doing real things, the ti 89 and the ti 92 plus
> are way faster to use than an HP48GX. ( I have all 3) If you get an
> 89 or a 92 plus, you won't be dissapointed. Both the 89 and the 92
> plus process at the same speed, but the 92 plus is faster to use. My
> 92 plus is my favorite, the only reason I got an 89 is so I can use it
> on a professional exam. It's up to you if you want to pay about twice
> as much for a 92 plus than an 89., but you won't think it's slow.
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 1998 12:44:41 +0200, Hekon Hansen <haakonha@ONLINE.NO>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi.
> >
> >I am contemplating buying either a TI89 or a TI92 PLUS. Because of hints on
> >the mailing list that the TI89 is slow in certain respects, I would be
> >extremely grateful if anyone could advise me on the performance of the TI92
> >PLUS.
> >
> >It would seem that they were quite comparable, but I would like to know for
> >sure. I might be better off with Mathematica (or other software) even if
> >this sacrifices portability.
> >
> >I am particularly interested in:
> >
> >- Performance (CPU / processing / calculations)
> >- Display quality
> >- General useability
> >
> >All answers most welcome. Feel free to email me directly if you do not want
> >to post to the list.
> >
> >My email address is: haakonha@online.no
> >
> >--
> >Yours,
> >
> >Haakon Hansen
> >student of Business Administration
> >Vestfold College
> >Norway
Follow-Ups:
References: