Re: Why not the TI-92?

Re: Why not the TI-92?

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Why not the TI-92?
• From: Kjetil <kjetil@FORPRESIDENT.COM>
• Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 13:32:43 +0200
• Organization: SOL Internett
• References: <356ba6cb.21535048@cdn-news.telecom.com.au> <bizmar-2705981126440001@ip02.sou.mind.net>
• Reply-To: Kjetil <kjetil@FORPRESIDENT.COM>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:23122

biz wrote:
>
> (I've tried all kinds of calculators, TI and HP)

I noticed you didn't put Casio in there with
the _real_ calculators. Thank you.

-Kjetil

• Why not the TI-92?
• From: Midnight Wells <autumn_storms@HOTMAIL.COM>
• Re: Why not the TI-92?
• From: biz <bizmar@MARTINI.OFFICE.CDSNET.NET>

• Prev: Re: calculator
• Next: Z-shell graphics
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread