Re: Why not the TI-92?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why not the TI-92?
>Midnight Wells wrote:
>
>
>What is confusing me is that there appear to be very few responses
>listing the TI-92 as the favourite calculator
>
Personally I would have to say that the TI-92 is being overlooked for
2 main reasons. It's size and the fact that it hasn't been around as
long. The 85 and the 82 calcs have been around for 5 plus years
and the 83s and 86s are just improvments on them.
Tomas C
Ps. Even thought the excuse given for the 92 not being allowed on
the SATs is the qwerty keypad, I believe the truth is that they are
afraid of the symbolic manipulation, but we will have to see if the
89s are allowed.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Follow-Ups: