Re: 83 vs. 85/86
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 83 vs. 85/86
Meanwhile we're all getting this message which there's no point in us
seeing. Follow your own advice and only send it to whoever needs to see it.
>I'm geting your msg's twice because you're sending to my address AND
>calc-ti.
>
>CaptainSp
>
>Joseph Gaffney wrote:
>>
>> At 04:23 PM 1/10/98 -0800, CaptainSp wrote:
>> >Gee thanks... it's nice to know SOMEONE out there pays attention to the
>> >fact that TI didn't intend to to give the TI-85 support for ASM.
>> >
>> >CaptainSp
>> >
>>
>> *Sigh...* You are ridiculous. Why did you say they would be documenting
>> it? Utterly preposterous behaviour.....
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> | Joseph M. Gaffney |
>> | Efnet: rm-rf - gaffney@thethinker.com |
>> | http://www.thethinker.com/members/gaffney/ |
>> ----------------------------------------------
______________________________
/\ Adam Berlinsky-Schine \
\ \ President \
\ \ adam@findcure.com \
\ \ DIMENSION-TI \
\ \ http://www.findcure.com/TI/ \
\ \_____________________________\
\/_____________________________/
Follow-Ups:
References: