Re: plans to build graphlink?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: plans to build graphlink?
From: The Pletchers <bpspcp-travelin@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 21:04:26 -0500
Reply-To: The Pletchers <bpspcp-travelin@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>

Let this sink in thick-head. I never said it was. Consider this the end of
the matter without further discussion. I'm tired of getting your slimy shit
in my mailbox.

At 09:00 PM 2/14/98 -0500, Joseph Gaffney wrote:
>At 08:57 PM 2/14/98 -0500, The Pletchers wrote:
>>Its also a trademark of one of the top 100 overpriced electronic products
>>available.
>
>Please pay attention, read slowly, and let it sink in (read repeatedly if
>necessary)....
>
>Overpriced or not, it is not a graphlink.... I can't say it isn't a
>graphlink enough because it isn't a graphlink, and maybe you will
>eventually understand it isn't a graphlink because it isn't a graphlink.
>Are you understanding now that it isn't a graphlink? Because it isn't a
>graphlink.
>


Welcome to the U.S.S. Crew
__________________________
-- http://www.jeffb.home.ml.org/
-- http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/1149/
================================================
ICQ UIN (if you have ICQ)        -- 2097846
ICQ E-mail Express (if you dont) -- mailto:2097846@wwp.mirabilis.com

Follow-Ups:

Re: plans to build graphlink?

From: Joseph Gaffney <gaffney@THETHINKER.COM>