Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Who also thinks the TI-85 is a great classic?



On 13 Dec 1998 06:02:47 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:

>85s are very fast, and very efficient, but don't have enough functions. 9x
>calcs are slower, and less efficient, but have PLENTY of functions.

I was refering to the speed of the user interface, not the actual
calculation.  My calculator spends more time waiting for me than actually
calculating.
--
TheLaser <prjohnson at utahlinx dot com>


References: