Re: Graphics 85 vs 86
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Graphics 85 vs 86
It should be the same for the 85 and the 86
but the graphics for fargo ti92 is 20 times better
because of the 7 grayscales (for pictures) and the size screen
> ''~``
> ( o o )
> ____.oooO__(_)__Oooo._______
> / _____ ___ _____ _____ \
> [ |_ _| | | | _ | |__ | ]
> | | | | | | |_| | __|__| ]
> | | | | | |___ | | |__ ]
> | |__| |__| |_ | |____| ]
> | oooO @ juno.com ]
> [ ( ) Oooo ]
> \________\ (__( )___________/
> \_) ) /
> (_/
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997 04:59:29 +0900 Bishop <ldgregory@BIOGATE.COM> writes:
>I have been looking at screenshots for alot of the TI85 games (I
>haven't
>built my cable yet, I'm waiting on my 2.5mm jacks, so I haven't loaded
>any
>games other than some BASIC ones by hand.) and they looked pretty good
>(I
>have a TI 85 BTW). This morning I accidentally stumbled onto the TI 86
>Fargo page http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/5275/ and the
>screenshots of Lode Runner and Magic Knights were astounding. Are the
>86's
>graphics better, or the same and I just haven't run across a good
>screen
>shot for the 85 games?
>
>Any help would be great...
>
>Thanx
>
References: